|
1
|
- Stimuli Analysis & Curriculum Development
|
|
2
|
- Stimulus generalization problems are one of the most commonly noted
characteristics of autism (Sasso, Garrison-Harrrel, McMahon, & Peck,
1998; Sundberg & Partington, 1998; Belifore& Mace, 1994; Scott,
Clark, & Brady, 2000
|
|
3
|
- Consider the student whose teacher said the student was taught her
letters.
|
|
4
|
- These were her training stimuli.
|
|
5
|
- Her consultant cut the pictures off and showed her these….
|
|
6
|
- Her consultant showed her these…
|
|
7
|
- The student didn’t know her letters.
- Guess who’s fault it wasn’t?
- Guess who was not very happy?
|
|
8
|
- an abstract or generic idea generalized from particular instances
(Webster’s On-line Collegiate Dictionary)
- Any stimulus property(ies) that set the occasion for the same or
functionally equivalent responses
- “A common tact that is under the control of a subset of properties which
may be present upon a given occasion but probably never exclusively
compose such an occasion." Skinner, 1957)
|
|
9
|
- Critical
- Define the concept
- Required for delivery of reinforcement
- Comprise the Sd
- Variable
- Accompany, but do not define the concept
- Are not required for reinforcement
- Are often the source of stimulus control problems in instruction
|
|
10
|
- “ANY PROPERTY of a stimulus present when a verbal response is reinforced
ACQUIRES SOME DEGREE OF CONTROL over that response AND THIS CONTROL
CONTINUES to be exerted when the property appears in other
combinations.”-Skinner, 1957, p. 107
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Saying “Nid” under the conditions of:
- Two circles
- Filled and unfilled
- Position
- Blue
- Green
- Figures touching
- White background
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- Saying “Nid” under the conditions of:
- S1 / Two circles
- S2 / Filled and unfilled
- S3 / Position
- S4 / Blue
- S5 / Green
- S6 / Figures touching
- S7 / White background
|
|
27
|
- Number
- Size
- Context
- Colored
- Drawn / Photograph
- Whole Parts
- Perspective
|
|
28
|
- Variable Features
- = Inappropriate stimulus control
|
|
29
|
- Child’s behavior controlled by something else
- Child LOOKS like they know they answer
- Child LOOKS like they understand the concept
- Child really DOESN’T LEARN what they were supposed to learn
- Child’s time wasted
- Teacher’s time wasted
|
|
30
|
- Selecting appropriate stimuli
|
|
31
|
- Identify the concept’s variable attributes
- Select stimuli that cover all attributes
- Use all stimuli right from the start
|
|
32
|
- Look at the following exemplars
- Decide if they would teach the concept Flag?
|
|
33
|
- Account for some but NOT all variable features.
|
|
34
|
- Look at the following training set and determine if they would
adequately teach running.
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
- Look at these examples
- Decide
- Would they adequately teach the child to answer “WHO”questions?
- “Jane ran home.”
- “Mark skipped down the hall.”
- “Jesus marched quickly.”
- “Daniel fell to the ground.”
- “Molly barked loudly.”
|
|
38
|
- Teaching set:
- “Jane ran home.”
- “Mark skipped down the hall.”
- “Jesus marched quickly.”
- “Daniel fell to the ground.”
- “Molly barked loudly.”
- Testing set:
- “Sally and John came over for dinner.”
- Late last night, Mark stopped by.”
- “He fanned the flames.”
- “John ran home and Sally went with Sharon.”
|
|
39
|
- In-situ
- Isolated
- Single/multiple
- Perspective (profile, front on, back)
- Zoom (whole picture, part of picture)
- Cartoon
- Color
- Line drawing
- Photograph
|
|
40
|
- The following pictures represent the minimum rational set-Correct or
Incorrect
- If incorrect, state what is missing
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
- Examples of multiples
- NEXT SET - ZIPPERS
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
- NONE – Good Set
- NEXT - SWIMMING
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
- NONE – GOOD SET
- NEXT CONCEPT - CLIMBING
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
- Black and white
- Line drawings
- NEXT CONCEPT - PLATES
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
- In-situ pictures
- NEXT CONCEPT - CHAIRS
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
- Cartoon pictures
- NEXT CONCEPT - BIKING
|
|
53
|
|
|
54
|
- NONE – GOOD SET
- NEXT CONCEPT - VEHICLES
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
- Additional water vehicles
- Additional trains
- Construction Vehicles
- NEXT CONCEPT – What Questions
|
|
57
|
- “She ran home.”
- “All the kids skipped down the hall.”
- “Pete marched quickly.”
- “Daniel always fell to the ground.”
- “In the morning, Molly barked loudly.”
- What did she do?
- What did the kids do?
- What did Pete do?
- What did Daniel do?
- What did Molly do?
- NEXT CONCEPT ADVERBS
|
|
58
|
- “She ran home.”
- “All the kids had skipped with a jump rope.
- “Jesus marches quickly.”
- “Daniel always is falling to the ground.”
- “In the morning, the brown dog barked at the cat.”
- What did Jane do?
- What had all the kids done?
- What did the kids skip with?
- What does Jesus do?
- What is Daniel doing?
- What kind of dog?
- What did the dog do?
- What was the dog barking at?
|
|
59
|
- The boy worked quickly to complete his homework.”
- The professor really appreciated students who worked diligently.
- Tomorrow, Molly will bark.”
- Wow! Sam played hard.
- Tony does pilates daily.
- She wore a rather funny coat.
|
|
60
|
- No adverbs
- “not” as an adverb
- Discriminate with other -lywords which are not adverbs:
- Friendly
- Burly
- Neighborly
- NEXT CONCEPT “WH” QUESTIONS
|
|
61
|
- “She ran home.”
- Where did she run?
- Who ran?
- “All the kids had skipped down the hall.”
- Where did they skip?
- Who skipped?
- “Pete marches quickly.”
- Where did he march?
- Who marched?
- “Daniel always is falling to the ground.”
- Where did he fall?
- Who fell?
|
|
62
|
- What did she do?
- When did she run?
- What did the kids do?
- When did they skip?
- What did Pete do?
- When did Pete march?
- Variability in question order
- Who, where, what, when
- When, where, what, who,
- Etc.
- Variability in answers vs. I don’t know responses
- Variation in question format
- What did Jesus do?
- What did he do?
- NEXT CONCEPT MATH EQUATIONS
|
|
63
|
|
|
64
|
- Vertical equations in addition to horizontal equations
|
|
65
|
|
|
66
|
- Generic tact extension
- [untaught] response emitted under the control of critical attributes
- Our goal (emphasis on the untaught)
- Metaphorical tact extension
- Response emitted under control of a stimulus that shares some (but not
all) critical attributes with the original stimuli
- •Metanymical tact extension
- Response emitted under control of variable attributes
- Solecistic tact extension
- Response to irrelevant stimulus features
|
|
67
|
|
|
68
|
- Metaphorical
- More discrimination training on examples & non-examples
- Ensure non-examples lack one and only one critical attribute
|
|
69
|
- Metanymical
- Revisit the concept analysis and the teaching materials to ensure that
attributes are correctly sorted as critical or variable
- Ensure that teaching examples contain a full range of variable
attributes
|
|
70
|
- Solecistic
- Increase (significantly) the number of examples
- Ensure that those vary across all irrelevant stimulus properties
- Add items that share those stimulus properties to other instructional
programs
|
|
71
|
- All human behavior is lawful
- Arises through historical interaction of an organism’s physiology with
its environment
- All operant human behavior occurs within a context
- Sd → R →Sr+
- Stimulus control problems involve inappropriate Sd•R relationships
- Those relationships occurred as a function of the organism’s learning
history
- A history largely arranged by us
|
|
72
|
- Therefore, it is up to us to arrange better learning histories
- A significant part of our learning history includes the materials
(stimuli) to which we are exposed
- Building better learning histories requires careful analysis, selection,
and arrangement of instructional materials.
|
|
73
|
- Children with autism have generalization problems
- Actually:
- Children with autism require us to be better instructional designers.
|
|
74
|
- ALWAYS use multiple stimuli
- Select the SMALLEST number of stimuli that represent the LARGEST range
of variable attributes
- Present ALL examples right from the beginning
- NEVER present only one concept at a time
- If no discrimination, no learning
- EXCEPTIONS
- Purposeful and planned use of inappropriate stimulus control
- Prompting procedures
- Enhancing stimulus conditions
|